Sex differences in cardiovascular disease: Are women with low socioeconomic status at high risk?

E. A. Vogels, A. L.M. Lagro-Janssen*, C. Van Weel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Cardiovascular disease is still portrayed as a typical male disease, and men are more often submitted to invasive procedures or referred earlier. Aim. To explore sex differences in morbidity and referral patterns in cardiovascular disease in general practice, and the role of age and socioeconomic status. Method. Data were obtained from a continuous morbidity registration project in the Netherlands from 1986 to 1995 in which 12,000 patients were followed over 10 years. The effects of sex, age, and socioeconomic status on morbidity of cardiovascular disease and the referral patterns were established. Results. The sex difference in morbidity becomes smaller with increasing age. Morbidity was highest in the lower socioeconomic status in general and for angina pectoris in particular. Women with angina pectoris with low socioeconomic status have a relative risk of 2.24 (CI = 1.17-3.26) compared with women with high socioeconomic status. In men, no significant difference was found between the socioeconomic status groups. For angina pectoris the sex difference in referral to the specialist was most significant: 50.6% and 26.6% (P = 0.002) for men and women respectively. Conclusion. For women, low socioeconomic status was associated with relatively higher morbidity of angina pectoris and myocardial infarction than for men. Women are less likely to be referred than men are, in particular for angina pectoris.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)963-966
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume49
Issue number449
Publication statusPublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sex differences in cardiovascular disease: Are women with low socioeconomic status at high risk?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this