Abstract
We investigated whether risk-taking measures inadvertently focus on behaviors that are more normative for men, resulting in the overestimation of gender differences. Using a popular measure of risk-taking (Domain-Specific Risk-Taking) in Study 1 (N = 99), we found that conventionally used behaviors were more normative for men, while, overall, newly developed behaviors were not. In Studies 2 (N = 114) and 3 (N = 124), we demonstrate that differences in normativity are reflected in gender differences in self-reported risk-taking, which are dependent on the specific items used. Study 3 further demonstrates that conventional, masculine risk behaviors are perceived as more risky than newly generated, more feminine items, even when risks are matched. We conclude that there is confirmation bias in risk-taking measurement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 744-753 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Social Psychological and Personality Science |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 19 Sept 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sex, Drugs, and Reckless Driving: Are Measures Biased Toward Identifying Risk-Taking in Men?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver