Shifting baselines clarify the impact of contemporary logging on forest-dependent threatened species

Michelle Ward*, Kita Ashman, David B. Lindenmayer, Sarah Legge, Gareth Kindler, Timothy Cadman, Rachel Fletcher, Nick Whiterod, Mark Lintermans, Philip Zylstra, Romola Stewart, Hannah Thomas, Stuart Blanch, James E.M. Watson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Despite the importance of protecting forests and woodlands to achieve global climate and biodiversity goals, logging impacts persist worldwide. Forestry advocates often downplay these impacts but rarely consider the cumulative threat deforestation and degradation has had, and continues to have, on biodiversity. Using New South Wales (Australia) as a case study, we quantify the extent of deforestation and degradation from 1788 (pre-European colonization) to 2021. We used historical loss as a baseline to evaluate recent logging (2000–2022) and the condition of the remaining native forest and woodland. Condition was quantified by measuring the similarity of a current ecosystem to a historical reference state with high ecological integrity. Using these data, we measured the impacts on 269 threatened terrestrial species. We show that possibly over half (29 million ha) of pre-1788 native forest and woodland vegetation in NSW has been lost. Of the remaining 25 million ha, 9 million ha is estimated to be degraded. We found recent logging potentially impacted 150 species that had already been affected by this historical deforestation and degradation, but the impacts varied across species. Forty-three species that were identified as impacted by historical deforestation and degradation and continue to be impacted by logging, now have ≤50% of their pre-1788 extent remaining that is intact and nine species now have ≤30%. Our research contextualizes the impact of current logging against historical deforestation and highlights deficiencies in environmental assessments that ignore historical baselines. Future land management must consider both the extent and condition of remaining habitat based on pre-1788 extents.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalConservation Science and Practice
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Aug 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shifting baselines clarify the impact of contemporary logging on forest-dependent threatened species'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this