Abstract
The central question of this paper is whether technology neutrality is, on balance, a helpful principle for green industrial policy (GIP). To answer this question, we first conduct a systematic literature review to understand what GIP is. We find that the term is most often used by authors in a neoclassical economic tradition and propose a definition that encapsulates the dominant elements of various definitions in this literature. Using a transdisciplinary approach, we turn to the question of technology neutrality in GIP. Considering a range of disciplinary perspectives and arguments, we conclude that the weight of argument and evidence lies strongly against de jure technology neutrality in GIP. Furthermore, the literature provides a range of alternative principles and approaches that can better address potential government failures in GIP and related policies. Finally, combining theoretical approaches and case-study evidence from the US Inflation Reduction Act and the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, we provide potential explanations for why technology neutrality nonetheless remains a popular principle in GIP.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 107-121 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Global Policy |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 13 Jan 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 13 Jan 2026 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Should Green Industrial Policy Be Technology Neutral?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver