Should medical students perform pelvic exams on anaesthetised patients without explicit consent?

Chloe Bell*, Nathan Emmerich

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    There have been many reports of medical students performing pelvic exams on anaesthetised patients without the necessary consent being provided or even sought. These cases have led to an ongoing discussion regarding the need to ensure informed consent has been secured and furthermore, how it might be best obtained. We consider the importance of informed consent, the potential harm to both the patient and medical student risked by the suboptimal consent process, as well as alternatives to teaching pelvic examinations within medical school. The subsequent discussion focuses on whether medical students should perform pelvic examinations on anaesthetised patients without personally ensuring that they have given their explicit consent. Whilst we question the need to conduct pelvic examinations on anaesthetised patients in any circumstance, we argue that medical students should not perform such exams without personally securing the patients informed consent.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)230-234
    Number of pages5
    JournalClinical Ethics
    Volume17
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Should medical students perform pelvic exams on anaesthetised patients without explicit consent?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this