Should only pharmacists hold pecuniary interests in a pharmaceutical business? Attorney General (NSW) v Now.com.au Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 276.

Jatine Patel*, Thomas Faunce

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The New South Wales legislature's policy of authorising only registered pharmacists to hold pecuniary interests in a pharmaceutical business is a component of Australian public health policy that accords with foundational principles and virtues of health law and bioethics. The case of Attorney General (NSW) v Now.com.au Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 276 considered what constitutes a pecuniary interest in this context, and how this should best be deduced from facts that may be contentious.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)502-507
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of law and medicine
Volume17
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should only pharmacists hold pecuniary interests in a pharmaceutical business? Attorney General (NSW) v Now.com.au Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 276.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this