Should only pharmacists hold pecuniary interests in a pharmaceutical business? Attorney General (NSW) v Now.com.au Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 276.

Jatine Patel*, Thomas Faunce

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The New South Wales legislature's policy of authorising only registered pharmacists to hold pecuniary interests in a pharmaceutical business is a component of Australian public health policy that accords with foundational principles and virtues of health law and bioethics. The case of Attorney General (NSW) v Now.com.au Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 276 considered what constitutes a pecuniary interest in this context, and how this should best be deduced from facts that may be contentious.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)502-507
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of law and medicine
    Volume17
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Should only pharmacists hold pecuniary interests in a pharmaceutical business? Attorney General (NSW) v Now.com.au Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 276.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this