TY - JOUR
T1 - SHRIMP 4-S isotope systematics of two pyrite generations in the 3.49 Ga Dresser Formation
AU - Liu, L.
AU - Ireland, T. R.
AU - Holden, P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 European Association of Geochemistry. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The 3.49 Ga Dresser Formation has been considered to host evidence of the earliest microbes metabolising sulfur species on Earth. However, previous bulk analyses and in situ measurements conclude disparate metabolisms based on opposite Δ33S1. This study first established the generations of pyrite growth, and then measured the multiple sulfur isotopes in situ using Sensitive High Resolution Ion MicroProbe-Stable Isotope analyses. Two main generations of pyrite were revealed based on core-rim textures and multiple sulfur isotopic compositions: Δ33S-positive Generation One (G1) and δ34S- and Δ33S-negative Generation Two (G2). In the chert-barite unit, the diluted Δ33S-positive and Δ33S-negative photochemical products were mainly sequestered in G1 and barite, respectively. G2 were formed via the sulfide pathway with sulfur derived from sulfate reduction and magmatic H2S. The δ34S-Δ33S-Δ36S1 systematics suggests an abiological origin for G1, and thermochemical and possible (minor) microbial sulfate reduction for G2.
AB - The 3.49 Ga Dresser Formation has been considered to host evidence of the earliest microbes metabolising sulfur species on Earth. However, previous bulk analyses and in situ measurements conclude disparate metabolisms based on opposite Δ33S1. This study first established the generations of pyrite growth, and then measured the multiple sulfur isotopes in situ using Sensitive High Resolution Ion MicroProbe-Stable Isotope analyses. Two main generations of pyrite were revealed based on core-rim textures and multiple sulfur isotopic compositions: Δ33S-positive Generation One (G1) and δ34S- and Δ33S-negative Generation Two (G2). In the chert-barite unit, the diluted Δ33S-positive and Δ33S-negative photochemical products were mainly sequestered in G1 and barite, respectively. G2 were formed via the sulfide pathway with sulfur derived from sulfate reduction and magmatic H2S. The δ34S-Δ33S-Δ36S1 systematics suggests an abiological origin for G1, and thermochemical and possible (minor) microbial sulfate reduction for G2.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106595071&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7185/GEOCHEMLET.2113
DO - 10.7185/GEOCHEMLET.2113
M3 - Article
SN - 2410-339X
VL - 17
SP - 45
EP - 49
JO - Geochemical Perspectives Letters
JF - Geochemical Perspectives Letters
ER -