Size doesn’t matter: Emotional content does not determine the size of objects in children’s drawings

Deryn Strange, Heleen Hoynck Van Papendrecht, Emily Macleod, Ingrid Candel, Harlene Hayne

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In Experiment 1 we examined whether children spontaneously alter the size of objects in their drawings of emotionally-laden events. To do this, we evaluated children’s drawings of their own personal, past experiences. Children were asked to draw a picture of an event that had made them happy and an event that had made them sad. We found no differences in the size of object that children drew in their positive and negative emotional events. In Experiment 2, we asked adults with and without clinical training to discriminate children’s drawings of happy events from their drawings of sad events. There was no difference in the accuracy of raters as a function of clinical expertise. Moreover, performance for both groups was at chance when we removed drawings with specific emotional indicators from the set (e.g. smiles or tears). We conclude that the emotional interpretation of drawings on the basis of the size of objects in that drawing is fraught with difficulty. We question the projective use of drawings in forensic and clinical practice. Keywords: child; memory; interview procedures; emotion; clinical assessment
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)459-476
    JournalPsychology, Crime and Law
    Volume16
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 7 May 2010

    Cite this