SMEs' compliance with risk management obligations in Australia's model WHS laws

Elizabeth Bluff*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Australia's work health and safety (WHS) laws require businesses and undertakings to manage risks. This article presents the findings of qualitative research investigating risk management in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in two states, through interviews, documentation review and observation in workplaces. The research found that most SMEs identified only some or few of the hazards for their operations and did not consciously apply the hierarchy of risk controls, at best implementing some higher level controls among a range of lower level ones. Poorer performance for hazard identification and risk control was linked with weaknesses in risk management methods, and SMEs applied their own criteria to determine control measures rather than the reasonably practicable standard, which was poorly understood. These findings were more pronounced in small enterprises than with medium enterprises. The research raises questions for WHS policy makers and practitioners about the translation of core legal principles, practices and concepts processes into workplace practice, particularly in smaller enterprises.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Occupational Health and Safety - Australia and New Zealand
    Volume33
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'SMEs' compliance with risk management obligations in Australia's model WHS laws'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this