Social impact assessment, social development programmes and social licence to operate: Tensions and contradictions in intent and practice in the extractive sector

Bruce Harvey*, Sara Bice

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the past decade, the extractive sector has embraced social responsibility. Despite this, broad-based support for many extractive projects and operations remains elusive. Community opposition to resource projects appears to be increasing, even where compliance-based social impact assessments (SIAs) and generous benefits are in place. In seeking to understand this, the authors explore unintended contradictions in the implementation of regulatory SIA and the social development programmes (SDPs) being pursued by many extractive companies. Communities continue to mistrust extractive companies in the face of escalating regulation and offsetting development agendas. The authors contend that trust can only be attained by mobilising a company's core competencies, achieving credibility through total transparency, and maintaining appropriate roles and responsibilities of companies, governments and communities. The article presents an alternative approach, centred on the trust-building necessary to a social licence to operate. Such an approach involves 'collaborative moderation', aligns with the 'creating shared value' concept advocated by Porter and Kramer, utilises best practice SIA and uses SDP only where appropriate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-335
Number of pages9
JournalImpact Assessment and Project Appraisal
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social impact assessment, social development programmes and social licence to operate: Tensions and contradictions in intent and practice in the extractive sector'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this