Social psychology and software teams: Establishing task-effective group norms

Alvin Teh*, Elisa Baniassad, Dirk Van Rooy, Clive Boughton

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    23 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    It's a common belief that groups that possess appropriate expertise and work well together will be more likely to successfully complete a project. However, social psychological research shows that getting the right mix of people doesn't guarantee a successful outcome. Group success also relies on group norms, which are derived as much from the group's context as from the people in it. A small, preliminary study illustrates how norm manipulation affected how well groups performed requirements elicitation. Results show that groups performed better on this task when norms emphasized creativity rather than agreeability. Norm manipulation might be a practical way to enhance group performance in software engineering tasks. There is an erratum in this article: in Figure 1, the description in the "Constructive norm condition" box should have read "Priming: list what they had learned in their requirements-analysis course." The description in the "Critical norm condition" box should have read "Priming: debate and reach consensus on the statement, "Requirements specifications should always reflect design constraints."

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number6095494
    Pages (from-to)53-58
    Number of pages6
    JournalIEEE Software
    Volume29
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Social psychology and software teams: Establishing task-effective group norms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this