TY - JOUR
T1 - Softening the agricultural matrix
T2 - A novel agri-environment scheme that balances habitat restoration and livestock grazing
AU - Ansell, Dean
AU - Fifield, Graham
AU - Munro, Nicola
AU - Freudenberger, David
AU - Gibbons, Philip
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Society for Ecological Restoration.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - The loss and degradation of woody vegetation in the agricultural matrix represents a key threat to biodiversity. Strategies for habitat restoration in these landscapes should maximize the biodiversity benefit for each dollar spent in order to achieve the greatest conservation outcomes with scarce funding. To be effective at scale, such strategies also need to account for the opportunity cost of restoration to the farmer. Here, we critique the Whole-of-Paddock Rehabilitation program, a novel agri-environment scheme which seeks to provide a cost-effective strategy for balancing habitat restoration and livestock grazing. The scheme involves the revegetation of large (minimum 10 ha) fields, designed to maximize biodiversity benefits and minimize costs while allowing for continued agricultural production. The objectives and design of the scheme are outlined, biodiversity and production benefits are discussed, and we contrast its cost-effectiveness with alternative habitat restoration strategies. Our analysis indicates that this scheme achieves greater restoration outcomes at approximately half the cost of windbreak-style plantings, the prevailing planting configuration in southeastern Australia, largely due to a focus on larger fields, and the avoidance of fencing costs through the use of existing farm configuration and infrastructure. This emphasis on cost-effectiveness, the offsetting of opportunity costs through incentive payments, and the use of a planting design that seeks to maximize biodiversity benefits while achieving production benefits to the farmer, has the potential to achieve conservation in productive parts of the agricultural landscape that have traditionally been "off limits" to conservation.
AB - The loss and degradation of woody vegetation in the agricultural matrix represents a key threat to biodiversity. Strategies for habitat restoration in these landscapes should maximize the biodiversity benefit for each dollar spent in order to achieve the greatest conservation outcomes with scarce funding. To be effective at scale, such strategies also need to account for the opportunity cost of restoration to the farmer. Here, we critique the Whole-of-Paddock Rehabilitation program, a novel agri-environment scheme which seeks to provide a cost-effective strategy for balancing habitat restoration and livestock grazing. The scheme involves the revegetation of large (minimum 10 ha) fields, designed to maximize biodiversity benefits and minimize costs while allowing for continued agricultural production. The objectives and design of the scheme are outlined, biodiversity and production benefits are discussed, and we contrast its cost-effectiveness with alternative habitat restoration strategies. Our analysis indicates that this scheme achieves greater restoration outcomes at approximately half the cost of windbreak-style plantings, the prevailing planting configuration in southeastern Australia, largely due to a focus on larger fields, and the avoidance of fencing costs through the use of existing farm configuration and infrastructure. This emphasis on cost-effectiveness, the offsetting of opportunity costs through incentive payments, and the use of a planting design that seeks to maximize biodiversity benefits while achieving production benefits to the farmer, has the potential to achieve conservation in productive parts of the agricultural landscape that have traditionally been "off limits" to conservation.
KW - Agricultural landscapes
KW - Cost-effective conservation
KW - Ecological restoration
KW - Farmland biodiversity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959880715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/rec.12304
DO - 10.1111/rec.12304
M3 - Article
SN - 1061-2971
VL - 24
SP - 159
EP - 164
JO - Restoration Ecology
JF - Restoration Ecology
IS - 2
ER -