Sovereignty and the antarctic treaty

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

    18 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Sovereignty was and still remains one of the principal reasons for human endeavour in Antarctica. The �Heroic Era� of Antarctic exploration was designed principally to seek out not only new lands including the South Pole, but also to assert territorial claims on behalf of the sovereign who sponsored these expeditions. The �planting of the flag� was therefore just as much a crucial component of Antarctic discovery, as also was the conduct of science. Sovereignty and science remained twin pillars of Antarctic endeavour throughout the early part of the twentieth century, and whilst the region escaped the horrors of World War II, it did not take long after the war for Antarctic endeavours to resume on both fronts. In a decade of frantic diplomatic activity during the 1950s, which was highlighted by the 1957�1958 International Geophysical Year and the 1959 Washington Conference, there was also the prospect in 1956 of a case before the International Court of Justice between Argentina, Chile and the United Kingdom over the contested status of territorial claims on the Antarctic Peninsula. Notwithstanding that by this time all of the current claims to the continent had by then been asserted, there had also been moves made by India in 1956 and then again in 1958 to reconsider the management of the continent with a view to its internationalisation under a framework created by the United Nations General Assembly.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)17-20
    Number of pages4
    JournalPolar Record
    Volume46
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sovereignty and the antarctic treaty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this