Speak No Evil: Scientists, Responsibility, and the Public Understanding of Science

Nicholas G. Evans

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this paper, I will discuss the responsibilities that scientists have for ensuring their work is interpreted correctly. I will argue that there are three good reasons for scientists to work to ensure the appropriate communication of their findings. First, I will argue that scientists have a general obligation to ensure scientific research is communicated properly based on the vulnerability of others to the misrepresentation of their work. Second, I will argue that scientists have a special obligation to do so because of the power we as a society invest in them as specialists and professionals. Finally, I will argue that scientists ought to ensure their work is interpreted correctly based on prudential, self-interested considerations. I will conclude by offering suggestions regarding policy considerations.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)215-220
    Number of pages6
    JournalNanoEthics
    Volume4
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Speak No Evil: Scientists, Responsibility, and the Public Understanding of Science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this