Speaking about the preborn. How specific terms used in the abortion debate reflect attitudes and (de)mentalization

Michał Bilewicz*, Gosia Mikołajczak, Maria Babińska

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to the Whorfian approach, language reflects and shapes cognitive processes, as well as attitudes. In this article, we analyze how people's preference to use one of the two terms used in the abortion discourse: “fetus” and “unborn child” can reveal their attitudes toward abortion and reflect deeper processes of (de)mentalization of the preborn. Study 1, which utilized a convenience sample of Polish internet users (N = 102), showed that people who used anthropomorphizing language opposed elective abortion more firmly than those using dementalizing language. The opposition to abortion among people using anthropomorphizing language could not be attributed to their religiosity, nor to their conservatism. Study 2, conducted with a more diverse sample of adult Poles recruited through an on-line research panel (N = 248), found that these differences were mediated by the emotionality ascribed to the preborn. Both studies provide evidence for the role of specific terms as reflections of deeper attitudes about the ontological nature of certain beings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)256-262
Number of pages7
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume111
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Speaking about the preborn. How specific terms used in the abortion debate reflect attitudes and (de)mentalization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this