Speaking softly without big sticks: Meta-regulation and public sector audit

Colin Scott*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    41 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Australian government has undergone an “audit explosion” in the last twenty years. This article observes, first, that the constitutional function of public sector audit institutions (AIs) gives them a strong cultural commitment to the assessment of the regularity and legality of public expenditure. New functions connected with performance audit and evaluation of nonfinancial performance indicators are liable to be interpreted through the lens of these more traditional concerns. The second observation is that, if we think in terms of “regimes” of financial control, we find that AIs form only part of the overall regulatory regime. This calls into question the coherence and potential for effectiveness of regimes of financial control. However, AIs could also be conceived as “meta-regulators” with the capacity to steer the self-regulatory capacities of public sector organizations in respect of financial controls. Auditors may be effective as meta-regulators through speaking softly, even though they demonstrably lack big sticks.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)203-219
    Number of pages17
    JournalLaw and Policy
    Volume25
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2003

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Speaking softly without big sticks: Meta-regulation and public sector audit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this