Abstract
This chapter examines the ethics and politics of using military force to protect populations from mass atrocities. I trace the emergence of the concept of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P), observing its deep historical roots as well as its rapid development in recent years. I then explore ongoing ethical and political debates concerning R2P and the use of force. I observe that, while virtually all states agree that the suffering of vulnerable populations should be a matter of international concern, some states continue to be reluctant to endorse a right of military intervention for their protection. They do so for both principled and pragmatic reasons. Meanwhile some other states, while accepting that there is such a right, resist suggestions there may be a duty to act to protect the vulnerable when such action does not coincide with their vital interests.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Ashgate Research Companion to Military Ethics |
| Editors | James Turner Johnson and Eric D. Patterson |
| Place of Publication | Farnham, Surrey and Burlington, VT |
| Publisher | Ashgate Publishing Ltd. |
| Pages | 89-99 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Edition | 1st |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781472416285 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Special Problems III: The Question of Using Military Force in the Frame of the Responsibility to Protect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver