Spectroscopy of82188Pb106: Evidence for shape coexistence

G. D. Dracoulis*, G. J. Lane, A. P. Byrne, T. Kibédi, A. M. Baxter, A. O. Macchiavélli, P. Fallon, R. M. Clark

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    54 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In-beam γ-ray spectroscopy of 188Pb has been carried out using Gammasphere. Time-correlated γ-γ coincidence methods have allowed the identification of new structures above and below the two-particle isomeric states. The detailed decay of the proposed Kπ=8 -, 1 μs isomer has been established, together with a rotational band based on the isomer. Both decay and band properties confirm the association with a prolate deformation and the two-quasineutron 9/2+[624] ⊗7/2-[514] configuration. The band structure identified above the 11- isomer from the two-proton configuration 9/2 -[505]⊗ 13/2+[606] has a moment of inertia similar to those of the bands known in heavier isotopes and to the one-quasiproton components, but the perturbations and in-band properties are not as expected for a simple, symmetric oblate deformation. This structure is fed by a (19 -) isomer. Possible configurations for this and other multiquasiparticle states are discussed in the context of multi-quasiparticle calculations for coexisting deformations. Low-spin structures populated partly from the decay of the 8- isomer have also been identified. Several of these may be associated with proposed excited 0+ states. Their properties, including yrare-yrast E0 decays and gamma-ray branching ratios, are analyzed using band-mixing models. These and other analyses support a shape coexistence scenario, with some qualifications.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number054318
    Pages (from-to)054318-1-054318-22
    JournalPhysical Review C - Nuclear Physics
    Volume69
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Spectroscopy of82188Pb106: Evidence for shape coexistence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this