TY - JOUR
T1 - Stakeholder perceptions of policy implementation for Indigenous health and cultural safety
T2 - A study of Australia's ‘Closing the Gap’ policies
AU - Fisher, Matthew
AU - Mackean, Tamara
AU - George, Emma
AU - Friel, Sharon
AU - Baum, Fran
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Institute of Public Administration Australia
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Indigenous peoples in Australia and similar colonised countries are subject to racism and systemic socioeconomic disadvantages, resulting in worse health outcomes compared to non-Indigenous counterparts. Such inequities persist despite governments’ attempts to reduce them. Since 2008, Australian governments have committed to a national ‘Closing the Gap’ (CTG) to reduce inequities in health, education, and employment outcomes between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and other Australians, but with limited success. We applied policy theory and a cultural safety framework developed for the research to analyse stakeholder perceptions of CTG policy implementation between 2008 and 2019. We identified policy-shaping ideas and policy incoherence in the environment surrounding CTG policy that obstructed culturally safe policy. Top-down, prescriptive modes of implementation were also a barrier. However, Indigenous-led policy partnerships and community-controlled services in the health sector have met principles of cultural safety. Identifying these strengths and weaknesses points to ways in which implementation of CTG policies can be improved to achieve cultural safety and reduce Indigenous health inequities. These results may hold lessons for similar countries such as the United States, New Zealand, and Canada.
AB - Indigenous peoples in Australia and similar colonised countries are subject to racism and systemic socioeconomic disadvantages, resulting in worse health outcomes compared to non-Indigenous counterparts. Such inequities persist despite governments’ attempts to reduce them. Since 2008, Australian governments have committed to a national ‘Closing the Gap’ (CTG) to reduce inequities in health, education, and employment outcomes between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and other Australians, but with limited success. We applied policy theory and a cultural safety framework developed for the research to analyse stakeholder perceptions of CTG policy implementation between 2008 and 2019. We identified policy-shaping ideas and policy incoherence in the environment surrounding CTG policy that obstructed culturally safe policy. Top-down, prescriptive modes of implementation were also a barrier. However, Indigenous-led policy partnerships and community-controlled services in the health sector have met principles of cultural safety. Identifying these strengths and weaknesses points to ways in which implementation of CTG policies can be improved to achieve cultural safety and reduce Indigenous health inequities. These results may hold lessons for similar countries such as the United States, New Zealand, and Canada.
KW - Indigenous health
KW - closing the gap
KW - cultural safety
KW - public policy
KW - social determinants of Indigenous health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105424600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1467-8500.12482
DO - 10.1111/1467-8500.12482
M3 - Article
SN - 0313-6647
VL - 80
SP - 239
EP - 260
JO - Australian Journal of Public Administration
JF - Australian Journal of Public Administration
IS - 2
ER -