State responsibility, international law and the Covid-19 crisis

Sarah Heathcote*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Disruptions caused by the global spread of COVID-19 have generated different types of responsibility claims at both the domestic and international levels. Alleged breaches of the law have resulted from the immediate reactions to the pandemic’s emergence and spread, as well as from less proximate adjustments made to the ongoing crisis. This contribution begins by briefly surveying the types of responsibility relevant to the crisis with a view to identifying systemic legal issues, particularly at the international level. It then focusses on the law of state responsibility for internationally wrongful acts, not to resolve the various claims that are or can be made, but in order to identify what this crisis reveals about the trends in the law of responsibility, the opportunities for its invocation, and indeed, state tactics in engaging with this body of law. Just as the pandemic has been revelatory of social trends, so too it has highlighted trends in the law and its operation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)122-140
    Number of pages19
    JournalAustralian Year Book of International Law
    Volume39
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'State responsibility, international law and the Covid-19 crisis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this