Abstract
Fama and French (2006) use the dividend-discount model to develop the role of expected profitability, expected investment, and the book-to-market ratio as predictors of stock returns. One reported empirical result is anomalous. The valuation model establishes that the comparative static relation between expected returns and expected investment is negative, yet it appears to be positive and insignificant. We show that the posited valuation relations apply at the firm level, and not at the per share level at which they were tested. Once the variables are measured at the firm level, all the Fama French predictions are validated.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 347-357 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of Financial Economics |
Volume | 110 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |