TY - JOUR
T1 - Stop contrasts in languages of arnhem land
T2 - From the perspective of jawoyn, southern arnhem land
AU - Evans, Bethwyn
AU - Merlan, Francesca
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - A number of languages in the Northern Territory are unusual amongst Australian Aboriginal languages in showing contrasts between two types of stops, the most salient feature of which is apparently duration of constriction. After placing the present work in context through discussion of analyses of neighbouring languages, this paper reconsiders the contrast in Jawoyn. Examination of the phonetic features that are correlated with the contrast indicate that not only duration of constriction, but also voicing through the closed phase and voice onset time play a role in its realization. Consideration is then given to the possible phonological analyses of this contrast. Three types of analysis, prosodic, segmental and geminate, are discussed, and while a prosodic interpretation of the Jawoyn data appears untenable, there is no clear evidence to indicate that either a segmental or geminate phonological analysis is more appropriate. Rather, it is argued that the evidence is 'indeterminate' at the phonological level.
AB - A number of languages in the Northern Territory are unusual amongst Australian Aboriginal languages in showing contrasts between two types of stops, the most salient feature of which is apparently duration of constriction. After placing the present work in context through discussion of analyses of neighbouring languages, this paper reconsiders the contrast in Jawoyn. Examination of the phonetic features that are correlated with the contrast indicate that not only duration of constriction, but also voicing through the closed phase and voice onset time play a role in its realization. Consideration is then given to the possible phonological analyses of this contrast. Three types of analysis, prosodic, segmental and geminate, are discussed, and while a prosodic interpretation of the Jawoyn data appears untenable, there is no clear evidence to indicate that either a segmental or geminate phonological analysis is more appropriate. Rather, it is argued that the evidence is 'indeterminate' at the phonological level.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066216367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0726860042000271825
DO - 10.1080/0726860042000271825
M3 - Article
SN - 1522-6514
VL - 21
SP - 185
EP - 224
JO - International Journal of Phytoremediation
JF - International Journal of Phytoremediation
IS - 1
ER -