TY - JOUR
T1 - Strong-field ionization of He by elliptically polarized light in attoclock configuration
AU - Ivanov, I. A.
AU - Kheifets, A. S.
PY - 2014/2/11
Y1 - 2014/2/11
N2 - We perform time-dependent calculations of strong-field ionization of He by elliptically polarized light in configuration of recent attoclock measurements of Boge [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 103003 (2013)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett. 111.103003]. By solving a three-dimensional time-dependent Schrödinger equation, we obtain the angular offset θm of the maximum in the photoelectron momentum distribution in the polarization plane relative to the position predicted by the strong-field approximation. This offset is used in attoclock measurements to extract the tunneling time. Our calculations clearly support the set of experimental angular offset values obtained with the use of nonadiabatic calibration of the in situ field intensity, and disagree with an alternative set calibrated adiabatically. These findings are in contrast with the conclusions of Boge et al. who found a qualitative agreement of their semiclassical calculations with the adiabatic set of experimental data. This controversy may complicate interpretation of the recent attoclock measurements.
AB - We perform time-dependent calculations of strong-field ionization of He by elliptically polarized light in configuration of recent attoclock measurements of Boge [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 103003 (2013)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett. 111.103003]. By solving a three-dimensional time-dependent Schrödinger equation, we obtain the angular offset θm of the maximum in the photoelectron momentum distribution in the polarization plane relative to the position predicted by the strong-field approximation. This offset is used in attoclock measurements to extract the tunneling time. Our calculations clearly support the set of experimental angular offset values obtained with the use of nonadiabatic calibration of the in situ field intensity, and disagree with an alternative set calibrated adiabatically. These findings are in contrast with the conclusions of Boge et al. who found a qualitative agreement of their semiclassical calculations with the adiabatic set of experimental data. This controversy may complicate interpretation of the recent attoclock measurements.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894480536&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.021402
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.021402
M3 - Article
SN - 1050-2947
VL - 89
JO - Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
JF - Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
IS - 2
M1 - 021402
ER -