Structural and elastic characterization of Cu-implanted SiO2 films on Si(100) substrates

J. Shirokoff*, C. K. Young, L. C. Brits, G. T. Andrews, B. Johannessen, M. C. Ridgway

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Cu-implanted SiO2 films on Si(100) have been studied and compared to unimplanted SiO2 on Si(100) using x-ray methods, transmission electron microscopy, Rutherford backscattering, and Brillouin spectroscopy. The x-ray results indicate the preferred orientation of Cu {111} planes parallel to the Si substrate surface without any directional orientation for Cu-implanted SiO2 Si (100) and for Cu-implanted and annealed SiO2 Si (100). In the latter case, transmission electron microscopy reveals the presence of spherical nanocrystallites with an average size of ∼2.5 nm. Rutherford backscattering shows that these crystallites (and the Cu in the as-implanted film) are largely confined to depths of 0.4-1.2 μm below the film surface. Brillouin spectra contain peaks due to surface, film-guided and bulk acoustic modes. Surface (longitudinal) acoustic wave velocities for the implanted films were ∼7% lower (∼2% higher) than for unimplanted SiO2 Si (100). Elastic constants were estimated from the acoustic wave velocities and film densities. C11 (C44) for the implanted films was ∼10% higher (lower) than that for the unimplanted film. The differences in acoustic velocities and elastic moduli are ascribed to implantation-induced compaction and/or the presence of Cu in the SiO2 film.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number043503
    JournalJournal of Applied Physics
    Volume101
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Structural and elastic characterization of Cu-implanted SiO2 films on Si(100) substrates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this