Structures of mutual obligation

Robert E. Goodin*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    80 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    'Mutual obligation' is a deft political slogan. Morally, it evokes deep-seated intuitions about 'fair reciprocity' and the 'duty of fair play'. It seems an easy slide from those intuitions to 'mutual obligation' policies demanding work-for-the-dole. That slide is illegitimate, however. There are many different ways to structure mutual obligation. Workfare policies, such as the Howard government's 'Mutual Obligation Initiative' in Australia, pick out only one among many alternative regimes that would answer equally well to our root intuitions about 'fair reciprocity'. Other ways of structuring mutual obligations within social welfare policy are both more standard and more desirable.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)579-596
    Number of pages18
    JournalJournal of Social Policy
    Volume31
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Structures of mutual obligation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this