Abstract
'Mutual obligation' is a deft political slogan. Morally, it evokes deep-seated intuitions about 'fair reciprocity' and the 'duty of fair play'. It seems an easy slide from those intuitions to 'mutual obligation' policies demanding work-for-the-dole. That slide is illegitimate, however. There are many different ways to structure mutual obligation. Workfare policies, such as the Howard government's 'Mutual Obligation Initiative' in Australia, pick out only one among many alternative regimes that would answer equally well to our root intuitions about 'fair reciprocity'. Other ways of structuring mutual obligations within social welfare policy are both more standard and more desirable.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 579-596 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of Social Policy |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2002 |