Student evaluations of teaching (SET): implications for medical education in psychiatry and an approach to evaluating SET and student performance

Jeffrey C.L. Looi*, Katrina Anderson, Daniel Bonner, Paul Maguire, Rebecca Reay

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: We present reflections on student evaluation of teaching (SET) in the context of recent higher educational research that assesses SET, as well as concurrent and/or subsequent student performance. Conclusions: In a sense, there is in-built cynicism in SET, with more favourable SET for easier assessment. There is emerging evidence that SET is inversely proportional to the performance of students in subsequent courses, i.e. the higher the ratings, the poorer the students perform in subsequent studies. It is proposed that SET should be combined with contemporaneous formative and summative assessments of student performance in medical school settings, especially in psychiatry education.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)463-465
    Number of pages3
    JournalAustralasian Psychiatry
    Volume28
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Student evaluations of teaching (SET): implications for medical education in psychiatry and an approach to evaluating SET and student performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this