Studying Africa in the Australian Capital Territory: Bureaucratisation, Disciplinisation and Projectisation

Ibrahim Abraham*, Rocco Weglarz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article analyses the experiences of scholars of Africa in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), advancing upon critical research on African Studies and contemporary academia. Drawing upon interviews with researchers, this article makes three arguments about the study of Africa in the ACT and Australia. Firstly, that universities have undergone bureaucratisation, altering the way researchers organise their working lives. Secondly, that the study of Africa in the ACT’s universities demonstrates disciplinisation such that researchers’ methodologies are more important to their identities and career trajectories than their regions of research. Finally, that research practices have undergone projectisation, with scholars increasingly employed on precarious contracts and periodically shifting their focus to or from Africa. It is argued that the African Studies paradigm and Africanist identity are inoperative in the ACT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-78
Number of pages25
JournalAustralasian Review of African Studies
Volume42
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Studying Africa in the Australian Capital Territory: Bureaucratisation, Disciplinisation and Projectisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this