Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help?

Grit Laudel*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    88 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Today science policy makers in many countries worry about a brain drain, i.e., about permanently losing their best scientists to other countries. However, such a brain drain has proven to be difficult to measure. This article reports a test of bibliometric methods that could possibly be used to study the brain drain on the micro-level. An investigation of elite mobility must solve the three methodological problems of delineating a specialty, identifying a specialty's elite and identifying international mobility and migration. The first two problems were preliminarily solved by combining participant lists from elite conferences (Gordon conferences) and citation data. Mobility was measured by using the address information of publication databases. The delineation of specialties has been identified as the crucial problem in studying elite mobility on the micro-level. Policy concerns of a brain drain were confirmed by measuring the mobility of the biomedical Angiotensin specialty.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)215-237
    Number of pages23
    JournalScientometrics
    Volume57
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this