TY - JOUR
T1 - Success in Closing the Socio-Economic Gap, But Still a Long Way to Go
T2 - Urban Aboriginal Disadvantage, Trauma, and Racism in the Australian City of Newcastle
AU - Howard-Wagner, Deirdre
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The research presented in this article is based on a four-year place-based qualitative case study of Aboriginal success in addressing Aboriginal disadvantage in the Australian city of Newcastle. The article presents extracts from in-depth interviews with Aboriginal people working on a day-to-day basis with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people experiencing disadvantage in this city. Interviewees define Indigenous disadvantage in a way that differs considerably from how it is defined in mainstream policy circles. They describe Indigenous disadvantage as being grounded in the histories of social exclusion from Australian society, rather than merely a contemporary phenomenon related socio-economic factors (i.e., lack of educational and employment opportunities). They indicated that it was (a) closely tied to Aboriginal experiences of displacement and trauma; (b) not just a material problem but a historical and social structural problem; and (c) unique to each community. For instance, urban Indigenous disadvantage is distinct from Indigenous disadvantage in remote areas. This supports the claims of Indigenous sociologist Maggie Walter (2009). In doing so, the article more strongly aligns with a critique of a neo-liberal racial project, which defines Indigenous disadvantage within an individualistic framework of individual rights and in terms of socioeconomic gaps, from the voices of Aboriginal representatives.
AB - The research presented in this article is based on a four-year place-based qualitative case study of Aboriginal success in addressing Aboriginal disadvantage in the Australian city of Newcastle. The article presents extracts from in-depth interviews with Aboriginal people working on a day-to-day basis with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people experiencing disadvantage in this city. Interviewees define Indigenous disadvantage in a way that differs considerably from how it is defined in mainstream policy circles. They describe Indigenous disadvantage as being grounded in the histories of social exclusion from Australian society, rather than merely a contemporary phenomenon related socio-economic factors (i.e., lack of educational and employment opportunities). They indicated that it was (a) closely tied to Aboriginal experiences of displacement and trauma; (b) not just a material problem but a historical and social structural problem; and (c) unique to each community. For instance, urban Indigenous disadvantage is distinct from Indigenous disadvantage in remote areas. This supports the claims of Indigenous sociologist Maggie Walter (2009). In doing so, the article more strongly aligns with a critique of a neo-liberal racial project, which defines Indigenous disadvantage within an individualistic framework of individual rights and in terms of socioeconomic gaps, from the voices of Aboriginal representatives.
KW - Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander
KW - Australia
KW - Indigenous policy
KW - colonisation
KW - racism
KW - urban Indigenous disadvantage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087723341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.18584/IIPJ.2019.10.1.3
DO - 10.18584/IIPJ.2019.10.1.3
M3 - Article
SN - 1916-5781
VL - 10
JO - International Indigenous Policy Journal
JF - International Indigenous Policy Journal
IS - 1
M1 - 3
ER -