Sulfur-enhanced defence: Effects of sulfur metabolism, nitrogen supply, and pathogen lifestyle

C. Kruse, R. Jost, M. Lipschis, B. Kopp, M. Hartmann, R. Hell*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    69 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Evidence from field experiments indicates differential roles of sulfur and nitrogen supply for plant resistance against pathogens. Dissection of these observations in defined pathosystems and controlled nutritional conditions indicates an activation of plant sulfur metabolism in several incompatible and compatible interactions. Contents of cysteine and glutathione as markers of primary sulfate assimilation and stress response show increases in Arabidopsis thaliana upon infection, coinciding with the synthesis of sulfur-containing defence compounds. Similar increases of thiols were observed with necrotrophic, biotrophic, and hemibiotrophic pathogens. Sulfate supply was found to be neutral or beneficial for tolerance against fungal but neutral for bacterial pathogens under in vitro conditions. According to various reports and own observations the effects of nitrogen supply appeared to be neutral or harmful, depending on the pathogen. The activation of sulfur metabolism was a consequence of activation of gene expression as revealed by macroarray analysis of an A. thaliana/Alternaria brassicicola pathosystem. This activation appeared to be largely independent from sufficient or optimal sulfate supply and from the established sulfate deficiency response. The data suggest that plant-pathogen interactions and sulfur metabolism are linked by jasmonic acid as signal.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)608-619
    Number of pages12
    JournalPlant Biology
    Volume9
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sulfur-enhanced defence: Effects of sulfur metabolism, nitrogen supply, and pathogen lifestyle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this