TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgical margins and risk of locoregional recurrence in invasive breast cancer
T2 - An analysis of 10-year data from the breast cancer treatment quality assurance project
AU - Behm, Eirene C.
AU - Beckmann, Kerri R.
AU - Dahlstrom, Jane E.
AU - Zhang, Yanping
AU - Cho, Carolyn
AU - Stuart-Harris, Robin
AU - Craft, Paul
AU - Rezo, Angela
AU - Buckingham, John M.
PY - 2013/10
Y1 - 2013/10
N2 - Aim: There is debate as to what constitutes an adequate excision margin to reduce the risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR) after breast cancer surgery. We have investigated the relationship between surgical margin distance and LRR in women with invasive breast cancer (IBC). Methods: Tumour free margin distances were extracted from histopathology reports for women with IBC, treated by either breast conserving surgery or mastectomy, enrolled in the Breast Cancer Treatment Group Quality Assurance Project from July 1997 to June 2007. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted to compare the risk of LRR for involved margins compared with negative margins, measured in increments rounded to the nearest mm. Results: 88 of 2300 patients (3.8%) experienced an LRR after a mean follow-up of 7.9 years. An involved margin, or a margin of 1mm was associated with an increased risk of LRR (HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.30-5.69), whilst margin distances of 2mm or greater were not. Risk of LRR with margin distances <2mm was particularly high amongst those not receiving radiotherapy (RT). Conclusion: Based on our findings, we recommend that a tumour free margin distance of 2mm be adopted as an adequate margin of excision for IBC, in the setting of patients receiving standard adjuvant RT and adjuvant drug therapies as dictated by the current clinical treatment paradigms.
AB - Aim: There is debate as to what constitutes an adequate excision margin to reduce the risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR) after breast cancer surgery. We have investigated the relationship between surgical margin distance and LRR in women with invasive breast cancer (IBC). Methods: Tumour free margin distances were extracted from histopathology reports for women with IBC, treated by either breast conserving surgery or mastectomy, enrolled in the Breast Cancer Treatment Group Quality Assurance Project from July 1997 to June 2007. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted to compare the risk of LRR for involved margins compared with negative margins, measured in increments rounded to the nearest mm. Results: 88 of 2300 patients (3.8%) experienced an LRR after a mean follow-up of 7.9 years. An involved margin, or a margin of 1mm was associated with an increased risk of LRR (HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.30-5.69), whilst margin distances of 2mm or greater were not. Risk of LRR with margin distances <2mm was particularly high amongst those not receiving radiotherapy (RT). Conclusion: Based on our findings, we recommend that a tumour free margin distance of 2mm be adopted as an adequate margin of excision for IBC, in the setting of patients receiving standard adjuvant RT and adjuvant drug therapies as dictated by the current clinical treatment paradigms.
KW - Breast Cancer Treatment Group
KW - Excision margins
KW - Invasive breast cancer
KW - Pathology
KW - Recurrence
KW - Surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884133191&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.breast.2013.02.018
DO - 10.1016/j.breast.2013.02.018
M3 - Article
SN - 0960-9776
VL - 22
SP - 839
EP - 844
JO - Breast
JF - Breast
IS - 5
ER -