Talking the talk: Therapeutic jurisprudence and oral competence

Lorana Bartels, Kelly Richards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Australian criminal justice systems, a wide range of pathways to sentencing and punishment exist alongside traditional court processes. In particular, therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ) processes have emerged during the last quarter of a century and now occupy a key position in the criminal justice landscape. This article provides an introduction to TJ, highlighting in particular the emphasis it places on the active participation of offenders, before critically discussing offenders capacity to engage with TJ processes. The article then summarises the research on the oral competence of offenders, and argues that offenders who lack oral competence may be disadvantaged in TJ processes. Finally, we provide an overview of the limited guidance that has been provided to TJ practitioners on how to maximise the participation of offenders with limited oral competence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-33
Number of pages3
JournalAlternative Law Journal
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Talking the talk: Therapeutic jurisprudence and oral competence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this