Teaching English or producing docility? Foucauldian analysis of Pakistani state-mandated English textbooks

Liaquat Ali Channa*, Daniel Gilhooly, Abdul Razaque Channa, Syed Abdul Manan

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The scholarship of language education, particularly with reference to learning and use of English, is marked by varieties of English. One may note two broad models: (1) ENL, ESL, and EFL; (2) EIL, ELF, and WEs. Although the scholarship is replete with debates, the debates seem to only construct and maintain that learning English and its use are neutral activities that earn and equip a learner with certain capital rather than make him/her as such. This paper draws upon Foucault’s theories of discourse and disciplinary power. This paper takes Pakistani state-mandated English textbooks of Grades 1–5 as official documents that contain qualitative data. The qualitative data are analyzed thematically. Two major themes of male body and female body are found which are analyzed and discussed through the Foucauldian lens. The paper holds that learning English and its use perpetuate and produce docility. The paper contends that neither is language a neutral tool nor are its use and learning value-free activities in any of its varieties.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number1283101
    JournalCogent Education
    Volume4
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Teaching English or producing docility? Foucauldian analysis of Pakistani state-mandated English textbooks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this