TY - JOUR
T1 - Technology assessment in Australia
T2 - The case for a formal agency to improve advice to policy makers
AU - Russell, A. Wendy
AU - Vanclay, Frank M.
AU - Salisbury, Janet G.
AU - Aslin, Heather J.
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - The pace and reach of technological change has led to calls for better technology policy and governance to improve social outcomes. Technology assessment can provide information and processes to improve technology policy. Having conducted a review of international best practice, we established a set of quality criteria for TA. In effect, good technology assessments are systematic, broad, inclusive and well resourced and are conducted by organisations that are trustworthy and influential. Although not having a formal TA agency, Australia does have a number of recent examples of TA-like activities in the form of ad hoc processes (such as reviews and inquiries) and within other organisations. Drawing on reports, commentaries, discussions and our observations as participants, we have assessed these activities and processes against our quality criteria. Our findings indicate that TA capacity in Australia is fragmented, uncoordinated and variable in quality and impact. We conclude that a formal TA agency could improve Australian technology policy and capacity for technology governance that would be more in line with other nations, notably in Europe.
AB - The pace and reach of technological change has led to calls for better technology policy and governance to improve social outcomes. Technology assessment can provide information and processes to improve technology policy. Having conducted a review of international best practice, we established a set of quality criteria for TA. In effect, good technology assessments are systematic, broad, inclusive and well resourced and are conducted by organisations that are trustworthy and influential. Although not having a formal TA agency, Australia does have a number of recent examples of TA-like activities in the form of ad hoc processes (such as reviews and inquiries) and within other organisations. Drawing on reports, commentaries, discussions and our observations as participants, we have assessed these activities and processes against our quality criteria. Our findings indicate that TA capacity in Australia is fragmented, uncoordinated and variable in quality and impact. We conclude that a formal TA agency could improve Australian technology policy and capacity for technology governance that would be more in line with other nations, notably in Europe.
KW - Consensus conference
KW - Office of technology assessment
KW - Participatory TA
KW - Social aspects of technology
KW - Technological change
KW - Technology governance
KW - Technology policy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956111454&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11077-010-9120-4
DO - 10.1007/s11077-010-9120-4
M3 - Review article
SN - 0032-2687
VL - 44
SP - 157
EP - 177
JO - Policy Sciences
JF - Policy Sciences
IS - 2
ER -