Abstract
The discipline of international relations is divided by competing conceptions of change. International relations formed as a modern discipline in response to humanity's growing destructiveness as monarchs, states and societies repeatedly went to war with each other. Twentieth-century scholarship in international relations grew up alongside a hopeful project embodied in an international movement: that if subjected to rational research and the close attention of concerned citizens, inter-state relations could be prevented from descending into the carnage of another world war.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Change! Combining Analytic Approaches with Street Wisdom |
| Editors | Gabriele Bammer |
| Place of Publication | Canberra, Australia |
| Publisher | ANU Press |
| Pages | 43-53 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Edition | 1st |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781925022643 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Teleology, Cyclicality and Episodism: Three competing views of change in international relations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver