TY - JOUR
T1 - Tensions for educational developers in the digital university
T2 - developing the person, developing the product
AU - Aitchison, Claire
AU - Harper, Rowena
AU - Mirriahi, Negin
AU - Guerin, Cally
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 HERDSA.
PY - 2020/2/23
Y1 - 2020/2/23
N2 - Digital education, now common in higher education, is particularly evident in the expansion of blended and fully online offerings at universities. Central to this expansion are educational developers, staff who support teaching and learning improvement in courses they do not themselves teach. Working closely with staff, students, and the curriculum, educational developers see first-hand how the digital learning agenda is both implemented and experienced. This article reports on findings from a national study of three educational development groups: academic developers, academic language and learning developers, and online educational designers, from 14 Australian universities. Although their institutional settings, roles, and work practices varied considerably, a central theme was the tension arising from a perceived shift in institutional priorities from ‘people development’ to ‘product development’: that is, from building human (educator) capacity towards curriculum resource development, particularly for the online environment. Participants reported a decline in autonomy, with institutional strategy and targeted projects increasingly directing both the work that gets done, and the skill sets required to do it. Their observations have implications for how universities conceptualise the development and support of the educational process.
AB - Digital education, now common in higher education, is particularly evident in the expansion of blended and fully online offerings at universities. Central to this expansion are educational developers, staff who support teaching and learning improvement in courses they do not themselves teach. Working closely with staff, students, and the curriculum, educational developers see first-hand how the digital learning agenda is both implemented and experienced. This article reports on findings from a national study of three educational development groups: academic developers, academic language and learning developers, and online educational designers, from 14 Australian universities. Although their institutional settings, roles, and work practices varied considerably, a central theme was the tension arising from a perceived shift in institutional priorities from ‘people development’ to ‘product development’: that is, from building human (educator) capacity towards curriculum resource development, particularly for the online environment. Participants reported a decline in autonomy, with institutional strategy and targeted projects increasingly directing both the work that gets done, and the skill sets required to do it. Their observations have implications for how universities conceptualise the development and support of the educational process.
KW - Academic development
KW - digital learning
KW - educational developers
KW - people development
KW - product development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074031173&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07294360.2019.1663155
DO - 10.1080/07294360.2019.1663155
M3 - Article
SN - 0729-4360
VL - 39
SP - 171
EP - 184
JO - Higher Education Research and Development
JF - Higher Education Research and Development
IS - 2
ER -