Testing the growth rate vs. geochemical hypothesis for latitudinal variation in plant nutrients

C. E. Lovelock*, I. C. Feller, M. C. Ball, J. Ellis, B. Sorrell

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    147 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain increases in plant nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations with latitude: (i) geochemical limitation to P availability in the tropics and (ii) temperature driven variation in growth rate, where greater growth rates (requiring greater nutrient levels) are needed to complete growth and reproduction within shorter growing seasons in temperate than tropical climates. These two hypotheses were assessed in one forest type, intertidal mangroves, using fertilized plots at sites between latitudes 36°S and 27°N. The N and P concentrations in mangrove leaf tissue increased with latitude, but there were no trends in N:P ratios. Growth rates of trees, adjusted for average minimum temperature showed a significant increase with latitude supporting the Growth Rate Hypothesis. However, support for the Geochemical Hypothesis was also strong; both photosynthetic P use efficiency and nutrient resorption efficiency decreased with increasing latitude, indicating that P was less limiting to metabolism at the higher latitudes. Our study supports the hypothesis that historically low P availability in the tropics has been an important selective pressure shaping the evolution of plant traits.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1154-1163
    Number of pages10
    JournalEcology Letters
    Volume10
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Testing the growth rate vs. geochemical hypothesis for latitudinal variation in plant nutrients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this