The 2014 international planning competition: Progress and trends

Mauro Vallati; Lukáš Chrpa; Marek Grzes; Thomas L. McCluskey; Mark Roberts; Scott Sanner

doi:10.1609/aimag.v36i3.2571

The 2014 international planning competition: Progress and trends

Mauro Vallati, Lukáš Chrpa, Marek Grzes, Thomas L. McCluskey, Mark Roberts, Scott Sanner

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

120 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We review the 2014 International Planning Competition (IPC-2014), the eighth in a series of competitions starting in 1998. IPC-2014 was held in three separate parts to assess state-of-the-art in three prominent areas of planning research: the deterministic (classical) part (IPCD), the learning part (IPCL), and the probabilistic part (IPPC). Each part evaluated planning systems in ways that pushed the edge of existing planner performance by introducing new challenges, novel tasks, or both. The competition surpassed again the number of competitors than its predecessor, highlighting the competitions central role in shaping the landscape of ongoing developments in evaluating planning systems

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	90-98
Number of pages	9
Journal	AI Magazine
Volume	36
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v36i3.2571
Publication status	Published - 1 Sept 2015

Access to Document

10.1609/aimag.v36i3.2571

Cite this

@article{297e1620189e41dcb12a629a5bda2cd5,

title = "The 2014 international planning competition: Progress and trends",

abstract = "We review the 2014 International Planning Competition (IPC-2014), the eighth in a series of competitions starting in 1998. IPC-2014 was held in three separate parts to assess state-of-the-art in three prominent areas of planning research: the deterministic (classical) part (IPCD), the learning part (IPCL), and the probabilistic part (IPPC). Each part evaluated planning systems in ways that pushed the edge of existing planner performance by introducing new challenges, novel tasks, or both. The competition surpassed again the number of competitors than its predecessor, highlighting the competitions central role in shaping the landscape of ongoing developments in evaluating planning systems",

author = "Mauro Vallati and Luk{\'a}{\v s} Chrpa and Marek Grzes and McCluskey, \{Thomas L.\} and Mark Roberts and Scott Sanner",

year = "2015",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1609/aimag.v36i3.2571",

language = "English",

volume = "36",

pages = "90--98",

journal = "AI Magazine",

issn = "0738-4602",

publisher = "John Wiley \& Sons Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The 2014 international planning competition

T2 - Progress and trends

AU - Vallati, Mauro

AU - Chrpa, Lukáš

AU - Grzes, Marek

AU - McCluskey, Thomas L.

AU - Roberts, Mark

AU - Sanner, Scott

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - We review the 2014 International Planning Competition (IPC-2014), the eighth in a series of competitions starting in 1998. IPC-2014 was held in three separate parts to assess state-of-the-art in three prominent areas of planning research: the deterministic (classical) part (IPCD), the learning part (IPCL), and the probabilistic part (IPPC). Each part evaluated planning systems in ways that pushed the edge of existing planner performance by introducing new challenges, novel tasks, or both. The competition surpassed again the number of competitors than its predecessor, highlighting the competitions central role in shaping the landscape of ongoing developments in evaluating planning systems

AB - We review the 2014 International Planning Competition (IPC-2014), the eighth in a series of competitions starting in 1998. IPC-2014 was held in three separate parts to assess state-of-the-art in three prominent areas of planning research: the deterministic (classical) part (IPCD), the learning part (IPCL), and the probabilistic part (IPPC). Each part evaluated planning systems in ways that pushed the edge of existing planner performance by introducing new challenges, novel tasks, or both. The competition surpassed again the number of competitors than its predecessor, highlighting the competitions central role in shaping the landscape of ongoing developments in evaluating planning systems

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85053153485

U2 - 10.1609/aimag.v36i3.2571

DO - 10.1609/aimag.v36i3.2571

M3 - Article

SN - 0738-4602

VL - 36

SP - 90

EP - 98

JO - AI Magazine

JF - AI Magazine

IS - 3

ER -

The 2014 international planning competition: Progress and trends

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this