Abstract
A lot of good philosophy is done in the armchair, but is nevertheless a posteriori. This paper clarifies and then defends that claim. Among the a posteriori activities done in the armchair are assembling and evaluating commonplaces; formulating theoretical alternatives; and integrating well-known past a posteriori discoveries. The activity that receives the most discussion, however, is the application of theoretical virtues to choose philosophical theories: The paper argues that much of this is properly seen as a posteriori.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 211-231 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Australasian Journal of Philosophy |
Volume | 93 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Apr 2015 |