TY - JOUR
T1 - The access implications of income-contingent charges for higher education
T2 - Lessons from Australia
AU - Chapman, Bruce
AU - Ryan, Chris
PY - 2005/10
Y1 - 2005/10
N2 - This paper describes the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS), Australia's income-contingent charge mechanism, and analyses its impact on the social composition of university participation. We consider university participation data from three cohorts of young Australians. The first completed their schooling prior to HECS, the second following its introduction and the third after the scheme was amended substantially. We find that the social composition of participants was different in 1999 from that of 1988: the distribution was more equal. That outcome reflected strong relative growth in participation in the middle of the wealth distribution. Other aspects of university participation also changed: participation grew more strongly among females than males. We find no evidence that participation fell among 'marginal decision makers' - those who, while at school, did not intend to study at university. We conclude that HECS did not discourage university participation in general or among individuals from low wealth groups.
AB - This paper describes the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS), Australia's income-contingent charge mechanism, and analyses its impact on the social composition of university participation. We consider university participation data from three cohorts of young Australians. The first completed their schooling prior to HECS, the second following its introduction and the third after the scheme was amended substantially. We find that the social composition of participants was different in 1999 from that of 1988: the distribution was more equal. That outcome reflected strong relative growth in participation in the middle of the wealth distribution. Other aspects of university participation also changed: participation grew more strongly among females than males. We find no evidence that participation fell among 'marginal decision makers' - those who, while at school, did not intend to study at university. We conclude that HECS did not discourage university participation in general or among individuals from low wealth groups.
KW - Educational economics
KW - Educational finance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20344363871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.08.009
DO - 10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.08.009
M3 - Article
SN - 0272-7757
VL - 24
SP - 491
EP - 512
JO - Economics of Education Review
JF - Economics of Education Review
IS - 5
ER -