The arcsine is asinine: The analysis of proportions in ecology

David I. Warton, Francis K.C. Hui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1867 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The arcsine square root transformation has long been standard procedure when analyzing proportional data in ecology, with applications in data sets containing binomial and non-binomial response variables. Here, we argue that the arcsine transform should not be used in either circumstance. For binomial data, logistic regression has greater interpretability and higher power than analyses of transformed data. However, it is important to check the data for additional unexplained variation, i.e., overdispersion, and to account for it via the inclusion of random effects in the model if found. For non-binomial data, the arcsine transform is undesirable on the grounds of interpretability, and because it can produce nonsensical predictions. The logit transformation is proposed as an alternative approach to address these issues. Examples are presented in both cases to illustrate these advantages, comparing various methods of analyzing proportions including untransformed, arcsine- and logit-transformed linear models and logistic regression (with or without random effects). Simulations demonstrate that logistic regression usually provides a gain in power over other methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-10
Number of pages8
JournalEcology
Volume92
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The arcsine is asinine: The analysis of proportions in ecology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this