The Badness of Dying Early

John Broome

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    A common intuition suggests that it is less bad for an infant to die than for a young adult to die. This is puzzling because the infant has more life ahead of her than a young adult, so it seems she loses more when she dies. Jeff McMahan supports the common intuition and defends it by means of what he calls the �Time-Relative Interest Account� of the badness of death. I shall describe two possible interpretations of the Time-Relative Interest Account and raise a problem for each. Then I shall offer an alternative defense of the common intuition, which is an extension of the theory in population ethics known as �critical-level utilitarianism.� Keywords: critical level, gradual creation, neutral level, relative value, value of life
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationSaving People from the Harm of Death
    EditorsEspen Gamlund, Carl Tollef Solberg
    Place of PublicationUnited States
    PublisherOxford University Press
    Pages105-115
    Volume1
    Edition1st
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Badness of Dying Early'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this