Abstract
Neuroimaging studies of the resting state continue to gather philosophical and scientific attention. Most discussions assume an identification between resting-state activity and activity in the so-called default mode network. I argue we should resist this identification, structuringmydiscussionaroundadilemmafirst posed by Morcom and Fletcher. I offer an alternative view of rest as a state dominatedby long-term processes and show how interaction effects might thereby let rest shed light on short-term changes in activation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 974-985 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Philosophy of Science |
| Volume | 81 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |