The Causal-Process-Model Theory of Mechanisms

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    97 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Wesley Salmon and the author of this chapter have argued that causation and causal explanation need to appeal to causal processes understood in terms of conserved quantities. This has the consequence of ruling out absence causation as being genuine causation. Carl Craver has argued persuasively that absences are crucial in causal explanations in neuroscience, and so he gives an account of mechanisms in terms of causal relevance where the latter is understood along the lines of causal modelling. This allows for absences to be causes and hence to feature in causal explanations, but it is not compatible with the claim that causal explanation needs to appeal to causal processes understood in terms of conserved quantities. This chapter therefore offers an account of mechanisms, in particular the role of causal relevance in mechanisms, which can respect the theory that causation involves causal processes understood in terms of conserved quantities, but which also allows absences to figure in causal explanation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationCausality in the Sciences
    EditorsP McKay Illari, F Russo & J Williamson
    Place of PublicationNew York, USA
    PublisherOxford University Press
    Pages865-879pp
    Volume1
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9780199574131
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Causal-Process-Model Theory of Mechanisms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this