Abstract
The Cook Islands Court of Appeal handed down an important decision in early 2016 dealing with the issue of whether the state or a customary authority had the right to decide entitlement to a major customary title in the Cook Islands. As such, the case raises an issue that continues to be highly contested in many Pacific island nations: the limits of adjudicatory responsibility of customary authorities within the nations constitutional framework. That such issues continue to arise in the Cook Islands, even fifty years after internal self-governance, is a testimony to the complexity of the task of determining the role of custom, customary leaders and institutions within an introduced legal and governance framework.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 26-38 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of South Pacific Law |
| Volume | 2016 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The challenges of legal pluralism in the cook Islands and beyond: An insight from hunt and tupou & ors v miguel, Cook Islands court of appeal, 19 February 2016'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver