The changing nature of employment-related sexual harassment: Evidence from the U.S. federal government, 1978-1994

Heather Antecol*, Deborah Cobb-Clark

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    18 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper examines the changing nature of attitudes toward and reports of sexual harassment using data for 1978-94 drawn from the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB) of the U.S. federal government. The authors find that although unwanted sexual behavior reported by federal government employees changed only slightly in overall incidence over the period, its pattern changed noticeably. Unwanted sexual attention by supervisors, for example, declined in incidence; crude and offensive behavior by co-workers increased; and the likelihood that harassment would occur only once (rather than repeatedly) increased. Employees' attitudes toward sexual harassment changed markedly, with a dramatically increased willingness to define unwanted sexual behavior as sexual harassment. This trend appears to have been due not to changes in employees' demographic, human capital, and job characteristics, but rather to structural changes in their views of what constitutes sexual harassment.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)443-461
    Number of pages19
    JournalILR Review
    Volume57
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The changing nature of employment-related sexual harassment: Evidence from the U.S. federal government, 1978-1994'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this