The combet case and the appropriation of taxpayers' funds for political advertising - An erosion of fundamental principles?

Geoffrey Lindell*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article contains a critical discussion of Combet v The Commonwealth (2005) and the reasons given by the High Court in that case, for dismissing the legal challenge to the present government's political advertising campaign in support of its Workchoice legislation which was conducted before the publication or enactment of that legislation. It also deals with the implications of the case for the declining significance in modern times of the parliamentary appropriation process as a means of ensuring the accountability of governments for the expenditure of taxpayers' funds. The article concludes with a discussion of the possibility of future parliaments (regardless of their political complexion) reasserting their control over the appropriation process and restricting the use of government advertising for political purposes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-328
Number of pages22
JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
Volume66
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The combet case and the appropriation of taxpayers' funds for political advertising - An erosion of fundamental principles?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this