The complementary niches of anthropocentric and biocentric conservationists

Malcolm L. Hunter, Kent H. Redford, David B. Lindenmayer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    51 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A divergence of values has become apparent in recent debates between conservationists who focus on ecosystem services that can improve human well-being and those who focus on avoiding the extinction of species. These divergent points of view fall along a continuum from anthropocentric to biocentric values, but most conservationists are relatively closer to each other than to the ends of the spectrum. We have some concerns with both positions but emphasize that conservation for both people and all other species will be most effective if conservationists focus on articulating the values they all share, being respectful of divergent values, and collaborating on common interests. The conservation arena is large enough to accommodate many people and organizations whose diverse values lead them to different niches that can, with good will and foresight, be far more complementary than competitive.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)641-645
    Number of pages5
    JournalConservation Biology
    Volume28
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The complementary niches of anthropocentric and biocentric conservationists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this