Abstract
While intellectual property rights (IPR) are not an independent part of Chinas recently promulgated Civil Code, this concept penetrates the entire Civil Code. This article analyses such penetration through interpreting the Civil Codes definition of IPR, mapping provisions directly mentioning IPR, and discussing the relationship between IPR and closely related issuessuch astechnology contracts, personal information, data and internet virtual property, and punitive damages.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 43-47 |
Journal | European Intellectual Property Review (E.I.P.R) |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 2022 |