The Concordance of Self-Reported and Officially Recorded Criminal Onset: Results From a Sample of Australian Prisoners

Jason L. Payne*, Alex R. Piquero

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study examines the concordance of self-reported and officially recorded criminal onset among a sample of prisoners in Queensland, Australia. Classified into one of four developmental stages, Gwet’s Agreement Coefficient 1 (AC1) is used to examine the concordance of these two popular data sources. Analysis is conducted across seven offense types, and comparisons are made between Indigenous and non-Indigenous offenders. Results indicate moderate agreement between self-reports and official records with greater concordance for violent and serious property offenses. With few exceptions, self-reported onset precedes officially recorded onset, and concordance was greater for Indigenous offenders. These findings have important methodological implications for criminological research, in particular, developmental and life-course theory, which emphasizes the theoretical importance of the timing and sequencing of criminal events.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)448-471
    Number of pages24
    JournalCrime and Delinquency
    Volume64
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Concordance of Self-Reported and Officially Recorded Criminal Onset: Results From a Sample of Australian Prisoners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this